LMW
LMW

Do you want to advertise here? Contact us

OEM Play Store
OEM Play Store

Do you want to advertise here? Contact us

Saving OPEX for a reputed Pharma Giant using bioaugmentation
.

Saving OPEX for a reputed Pharma Giant using bioaugmentation

By September 11, 2024 2:19 pm IST

A reputed pharma giant partnered with Team One Biotech to enhance their wastewater treatment efficiency using bioaugmentation, reducing COD/BOD, scaling in MEE, and commodity costs. This resulted in 20% OPEX savings and improved overall treatment performance.

The reputed pharma giant is known for contributing to the pharma sector worldwide. This unit is one of the largest API (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients) producers that manufacture products such as Tamsulosin, Metformin, Esomeprazole, etc. The unit has a full-fledged ETP (Effluent Treatment Plant), a traditional ASP system. It also treats its wastewater religiously. The unit had an MEE (Multi Effect Evaporator) installed to treat the high COD (Chemical oxygen demand) stream. Due to the production of multiple products, the ETP received multiple effluent streams with tough-to-degrade pollutants like toluene, benzene, Metformin, Acetic Acid, Methanol etc. Due to such streams, it was difficult for them to control ETP operations leading to heavier expenses specifically on the MEE part as it was receiving a heavier load compared to its capacity. 

ETP details: 

The industry had primary treatment, biological treatment, and then a tertiary treatment. 

Flow (current) 450 KLD
Flow (design) 500 KLD
Type of process ASP
No. of aeration tanks 3 (in series)
Capacity of aeration tanks 500 KL, 450 KL, 300 KL respectively
Retention Time 67 hours(combined)

MEE Details: 

Capacity (current) 12 KLD
Current inflow 10 KLD
Inlet COD 150000 ppm
Inlet TDS 60000 ppm

Challenges: 

Parameters (PPM) Avg. Inlet parameters Avg. Outlet parameters 
COD 18000 9900
BOD 5000 3000
TDS 15000 9500

Operational Challenges: 

• The primary treatment was working at 5 percent efficiency for COD reduction.
• The Biological treatment worked at an average 45% efficiency for COD reduction.  

They struggled to effectively treat tough-to-degrade pollutants such as toluene, benzene, Metformin, Acetic Acid, and Methanol which compelled them to run the ETP at 10% less hydraulic load. 

A separate stream of higher COD was directed to MEE leading to scaling and fouling in MEE. 

The volume of the stream to MEE: 10 KLD 
COD: 150000 ppm 
TDS: 80000 ppm 

Financial Challenges: 

1. Urea -DAP consumption: 2160 Kg/month of Urea and 1200 Kg/month of DAP are required to boost the poor biomass in the biological tanks.  

2. Electricity consumption: Due to high COD effluent the power requirement went up from a normal 14250 KWH to 20250 KWH monthly. 

3. Raw Water Consumption: Due to High COD influence, there was a need for higher evaporation hence around 100000 litres of water was used monthly for MEE. 

4. Chemical Consumption: Due to high COD inflow in MEE there was extensive scaling due to which the MEE needed to get cleaned up regularly from Chemicals such as HCL: 22500 kg/month, EDTA: 11250 kg/month. 

Extra Costs incurred per month: 

Commodity Units required
Urea(in Biological tank) 2160 kg/month
DAP(in Biological tank) 1200 kg/month
Raw water consumption 100000 litres/ Month approx
HCL (10 % ) 5500 kg/month
EDTA 3200 kg /month
Electricity(MEE) 20250 KWH/month

The MEE cost per litre was coming to Rs. 1820/KL for 10 KLD capacity while the overall WWTP cost to treat 450 KLD effluent swelled to Rs. 200/KLD. 

The approach: 

The industry partnered with Team One Biotech to improve the efficiency of biological units and get rid of the burned-off extra expense they incurred in their WWTP.  

Team One Biotech adopted a 3D approach that included: 
1. Research/Scrutiny :  
• Team One Biotech visited their facility to go through the process of the existing ETP and to scrutinise the pain points and areas of improvement if any. 
The visit allowed Team One Biotech to explore potential improvements in the plant, specifically in the biological system and provided a ground for future troubleshooting during the treatment period.

2. Analysis :
• Analysis of the previous 3-month cumulative data of their ETP was done to see trends in the inlet-outlet parameters’ variations and the permutation combinations related to it. 

3. Innovation : 
• After the research and analysis, Team One Biotech curated customised products and their dosing schedules with a plan of action to get the desired results. This process is called bioaugmentation.

Desired outcomes : 

1. Reduction of COD/BOD thereby improving the efficiency of biological tanks.

Advertising

OEM Android App

Your future advertising space? Our media data

2. Degradation of tough-to-degrade effluents and develop robust biomass to withstand shock loads.

3. Reduction in scaling of MEE by reducing COD in biological systems and saving cost.

4. Reducing consumption of UREA-DAP. 

5. Cost saving by treating high COD streams in main ETP. 

Execution: 
Team One Biotech selected two products: 

1. T1B Aerobio: This product consisted of a blend of microbes selected as per analysis secrete enzymes that can degrade tough-to-degrade pollutants such as Toluene and Metformin etc. 
Apart from this, T1B Aerobio ensured the reduction of COD/BOD, stability in shock loads, and robust biomass. 

2. T1B MacMi: The product was introduced as a replacement for UREA-DAP. It is a plant-based gel that acts as a nutrient source for bacteria consisting of both essential macro and micronutrients. 

Plan of action: 

1. Diverting 2 KLD of MEE inlet to the main ETP Inlet with COD 150000 ppm. 

2. Diverting 3 KLD of MEE reject to main ETP inlet with COD 25000 ppm  

3. Dosing of T1B Aerobio in all three biological tanks. 

4. Dosing of T1B MacMi in all the three tanks

Average Inlet COD after the addition of streams from 2 KLD MEE inlet and 3KLD MEE reject in 450 KLD ETP: 18406 PPM. 

Results: 

Parameters Inlet parameters Secondary Outlet parameters  (ppm)
COD 18406-19000 ppm 2200 ppm
BOD 9290 to 10000 ppm 1400 ppm 

Cost Savings:

Commodity Units required before treatment Units required after treatment
Urea 2160 kg/month 432 kg/month
DAP 1200 kg/month 240 kg/month
Raw water consumption 100000 litres/ Month approx 50000 litres/Month
HCL (10 % ) 5500 kg/month 4000 litres/month
EDTA 3200 kg /month 2050 litres/month
Electricity(Extra) 675 KWH/day 478 KWH/day

With the reduction in commodities used for MEE and wastewater the cost to operate MEE came down to Rs. 1220/KLD and the overall ETP cost was reduced to Rs. 160/KLD.

The implementation of the bioaugmentation program resulted in significant improvements in the performance of biological units in their WWTP: 
• The unit achieved around 85% to 89% reduction from their current inlet parameters in COD & BOD.

• The overall ETP OPEX was reduced by 20%. 

• The ETP achieved full capacity operations in terms of hydraulic load. 

• The biological process became more stable and resilient to fluctuations in the influent characteristics. 

• Dependency on MEE to treat high COD effluent reduced. Source: Team One Biotech
www.teamonebiotech.com

Cookie Consent

We use cookies to personalize your experience. By continuing to visit this website you agree to our Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.

Webinar
Webinar

Do you want to advertise here? Contact us

Autodesk
Autodesk
Trucut
Trucut
OEM Update QR Code
OEM Update QR Code

Events

Logimat India
Logimat India
Metal Forming Expo
Metal Forming Expo
ChemProTech India 2025
ChemProTech India 2025
Aerodef India Manufacturing Expo
Aerodef India Manufacturing Expo

eMagazine December 2024

eMagazine December 2024
eMagazine December 2024

Do you want to advertise here? Contact us

Our Sponsors

Carl Zeiss India
Carl Zeiss India
STMCNC
STMCNC
Maco-c
Maco-c
Inovance Technology
Inovance Technology
Mallcom
Mallcom
igus
igus
Delta Electric
Delta Electric
Wago Pvt Ltd
Wago Pvt Ltd
Studer
Studer
Urgo Capital
Urgo Capital
Prostar
Prostar
Super Slides
Super Slides
Quality Spares Center
Quality Spares Center
Endress Hauser
Endress Hauser
ACE Micromatic Group
ACE Micromatic Group
Hosabettu Heavy Machinery LLP
Hosabettu Heavy Machinery LLP
Ceratizit
Ceratizit
Chicago Pneumatic Tools
Chicago Pneumatic Tools
Concord Hydraulics
Concord Hydraulics
MMC Hardmetal Pvt Ltd
MMC Hardmetal Pvt Ltd
Mennekes
Mennekes
TruCut
TruCut
Voestalpine
Voestalpine
tectyl
tectyl
LMW
LMW
BKT Tires
BKT Tires
Mitsubishi Materials
Mitsubishi Materials
Molygraph
Molygraph
Fietest
Fietest
Exorint
Exorint
Exon mobil
Exon mobil
Wika Instruments India
Wika Instruments India